The Nikon Z mm f/4 S is exactly grams ( pounds), while the Nikon Z mm f/ VR is grams ( pounds). That difference isn’t enough to notice most of the time, unless you’re doing some serious ultra-distance backpacking where every ounce matters. However, I will point out that the Nikon Z mm f/4 S feels more Canon EF mm f/L USM. Released November Scores; Specifications; Measurements; Tested with; Canon EF mm f/L USM Scores; Specifications; Measurements; Tested with; COMPARISON SELECTION (3 selected items max.) VIEW COMPARISON ADD MORE Posted October 9, Hi all, the benefits of a large aperture (e.g., f) are clear: 1) Faster autofocus, 2) Better control of DoF, 3) Better low-light performance. At f4 one might have a. slightly slower autofocus in low-light, slightly larger DoF and of course a. decreased low-light performance I plan on getting the f, but mm at f4 gets you a smaller depth of field than 70mm at f, so I'd say it's a more useful lens as far as why kind of photography you can do. f lenses will be 1 stop better at low light, and as a general rule be sharper (assuming you keep the same focal length and f stop for both), as a bright The is sharper in the middle (mm where the is a bit weak wide open) they are about equal in the 70mm range. My biggest issue with the II is that it's almost as big and heavy as the , so why not carry the faster/sharper lens as your walkabout if you're going to lug that much around anyway
F4 vs F2.8 - how much difference in light is there: Canon SLR …
Pros. Excellent resolution. Quick, quiet autofocus. Dust, splash, and anti-smudge protection. Outstanding hybrid stabilization. macro focus. Cons. When I was shooting with my old 7D and a Sigma , I used 4, and 5, and all the time without any problems. A friend of mine who's used both these lens told me the f4 is tack sharp, better than the Thanks for any input you might have. I don't know that the f4 is better than the really The EF /4L IS USM Macro is a typical of Canon "L" series lenses. It feels solidly built and both focusing and zooming actions are smooth. The distance is scale marked from m to infinity with IR focusing marks for 24mm and 35mm. Focal lengths markings are found for 24mm, 35mm, 50mm and 70mm. After the 70mm mark is a macro range which Has a silent focus motor built into the lens. Canon EF mm F/4L IS USM. Canon EF 24mm F/ IS USM. Lenses with built-in focus motor focus faster and more quietly than lenses without a focus motor which rely on the camera's body 1. cornyevo. • 3 yr. ago. The RF is a BETTER lens in almost every way. You will get a better image, specially for portrait style photography which is a must. The will do a decent job but the is a league above it. You're comparing a the to a lens that is more than double the price of it
Is a Canon RF 24-70mm f/4 L on the way? | Digital Camera World
Wrote: "No doubt the two Tamron lenses will give you great results." Yes, this is a fact. They some are very good. As an example I don't know if I would choose the Tokina AT-X mm f/ Pro FX Lens over my Canon EF mm f/L III USM Lens but there is no doubt I would take it over my Nikon 1. cavideopro wrote: Looking for some feedback if anyone is using II with RP system. I'm torn between going native lens 4 RF or 24